Since we’re talking fanboyism let’s have a look at your bias. You’re supporting a system which has only now been redesigned so that one third to one half of the consoles made don’t die. It’s taken microsoft THIS LONG to repair their damn console.

I say one third to one half because the accepted numbers are 33 return rate but that’s not considering the number of people running a 360 and experiencing crashing but not system death (like me).

Maybe you’re lucky enough to have a flawless sytems but if that’s the case then you’re probably beating the odds. If you’ve REALLY never had a freeze or a crash on your 360 i envy you.

But you said you’re all about the games so lets look at that. I remember the 360 being scarce on games back in 2006 when i picked it up. I got it for Oblivion and there was a long drought after that where nothing was released. From a development perspective, Sony is performing exactly as the 360 was.

Online gaming? Sony is free and the 360 isn’t. Xbox live is better than Sony’s online support? Well there’s the upcoming innovation of Home which has thoroughly impressed me. It manages to take most of the better features of Xbox live and mesh them with a MMOG.

Then there’s the Playstation Eye which will mirror many of the functions of the Wii. Full body motion awareness with a built in background noise cancelling mic. Add to that the voice recognition potential and you’re looking at an impressive little device. No more headsets.

What has Microsoft done lately? the keyboard add-on for the controller?

We’re just starting to see the development of games that are outstripping the Dvd format. Id softwares Rage will fit on 1 blu ray disc or 2 Dvds. Do you want to start playing around with your 360 drive(in game) considering the lawsuits for gouged discs?

If Microsoft had taken the time to ensure the release of their console was flawless, then i’d be on your side but they didn’t.

It’s pretty obvious that both are so caught up in your ” Sony Fanboyism” that you will make up anything to defend the PS3. The diffrence is that i have both systems and i don’t mind taking about what bad in gaming about any system. As you two idoits seem to think that i have a one track mind and that i’m all about xbox360 witch happens to be the best system out there thats a FACT. I have the PS3 and i like it but it’s not showing anything mindblowing yet.And i have not found one moment were i have been bored with my xbox360 unlike my PS3 that the only time i turn that thing on is to pop in a Blu-Ray movie. And what i wrote is the truth. There is no advance ram in the PS3 just becaue it’s made to work with the cell does make it advance lol, All the PS3 has is cell and blu-ray and theres nothing wrong with that, But go ahead and keep cheerleading and swinging your pom poms instead of playing games witch is what i’m all about the games.

We all know this. (PS3 owners) Yet these other people (360 owners) see a bigger number in the same place and think that bigger is better. Not true in this case.

I guess we get stuck educating the masses.

Nice comment bro.

The xbox elite + halo 3 is the best chance MS have at staying in the game, so to speak. http://www.ecbiz.co.uk

Available from 24th. Pre Xbox elite order today!

Congrats!

The Xbox360 has only 512 GDDR3 Ram but the PS3 has the much faster and more advanced 256MB XDR Ram.
And 256 GDDR3 Ram. Both parts of the diverend Rams are accecable for both the RSX and the Cell wen needed.

That wole Ram story is the greatest mistake all the xbots are making.
The more advanced and faster XDR Ram will be making the difference, and the bandwith off the PS3 is also better and better to use for both the RSX and the Cell. The 360 has the problem that the bandwith is being used for the CPU and the GPU back and forward, to send data from de CPU to the GPU and than back again. By the PS3 its a oneway street from the Cell to the RSX and than to the output

The true is that the hardware of the PS3 is better in performance and more advanced than the hardware of the 360.