Comments on: MLB 10: The Show 30-Player Franchise Mode

By: paulykiss

paulykiss — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:24:46 +0000

so the 30 man franchise now means that me and my friends can do a franchise now insted of just doing a 2 man franchise we can do up to 30 teams this year? with fantasy draft and everything ?

By: deadghost4bailey

deadghost4bailey — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:28:42 +0000

wtf why does javier vasquez have a better overall then cc sabathia?

By: wiser66

wiser66 — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:32:08 +0000

Does this game have a “round robin” type online league where you can have 7 or 8 guys only playing each other in a league, or if we only have 8 people then the other teams have to be filled out by CPU players or other humans? Please help!!

By: SSUkid

SSUkid — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:30:46 +0000

When is the demo available?

By: NINERS_FAN

NINERS_FAN — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:02:55 +0000

I also wanted to ask if there is any inclination to updating the player progression? It really has been dreadful, and didn’t really seem to be correlated to anything, or make sense. a somewhat relative progression month-month based on how they are playing would be great. there then maybe some benefit to rebuilding and working at signing good prospects.

again, thanks

By: NINERS_FAN

NINERS_FAN — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:54:58 +0000

I am a baseball game addict, and just can’t seem to get enough of the SHOW series. From the last couple of years games, my only real gripe, and a pretty serious one, was injured players still counting against the 25 man active roster, and the 40 man roster not actually expanding until Sept. 4th or something. 2 minor things, but quite crippling when you couldn’t add players for the play-offs properly, and you became crippled once you had a couple injuries and couldn’t field a proper team. it became almost impossible to proceed when you only had 22 active spots or so, being force to have no bench so you could have enough pitching. Please let me know if these issues have been addressed, as they are of critical importance. aside from that, the attention to the franchise mode is so appreciated. thank-you

By: gatorman123j

gatorman123j — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:37:45 +0000

Hey guys the game looks incredible, I was wondering if this year we would be able to upload our 09 show player and use him in 10 road to the show this year? Thanks

By: aquarius9

aquarius9 — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:59:34 +0000

“Online Season Leagues do not have the option of having CPU teams – they are limited to users only.”

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Well, I won’t be buying the game. All my 3 friends and I want is the ability to play the “offline franchise”, but online. I was doing this back in High Heat Baseball in 1999. So ridiculous that 10+ years later I still can’t do it. I just don’t understand what’s so hard about adding a few more human-controlled teams to the offline franchise, basically.

By: draconis15

draconis15 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:36:33 +0000

I know this isn’t the place but I would love too see a more modified batting stance selection mode for the create a player/RTTS character, such as not only picking stace but swing type and even better the Homerun cut scene such as being able to put any type of homerun celebration to anyones stance, this would also be nice to see what each player does during the homerun cut scene because I personally like to have a cool cut scene with my RTTS player but it takes forever to find a good one that is on a stance i like

By: couchqb

couchqb — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:00:40 +0000

My only significant issue with MLB 09 was player progression in franchise mode. Specifically, for a user’s MLB players, almost all player ratings decline during the year and are not recouped during the offseason. This is true only for user-controlled teams, and only at the MLB level (minors progression seems to work fine, as does progression at every level for CPU teams).

I have tracked this in detail with many different coaches/managers/players, and the unmistakable trend is that a user’s MLB players, with a few exceptions, will slowly lose their abilities each year regardless of coaching, training, player age, or player potential (although players with less than ‘A’ potential decline more swiftly).

Can you please provide information whether this issue has been corrected (or even looked at)? Thanks.