Comments on: Resistance 3 Dev Diary: Enemy Munitions

By: Rahabib

Rahabib — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:06:07 +0000

I had high hopes for this game because they implemented the PS Move, but no server browser and the fact the iron sights for the move are not detached (as they are in every other game) made this a pass.

I am sick of games half assing it.

By: mastorofpuppetz

mastorofpuppetz — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:52:41 +0000

@60, disagree, R3 will be better then RFOM. RFOM was good but lots of improvement to be had,

By: twistedfloyd

twistedfloyd — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:48:45 +0000

Absolutely love all the weapons I’ve played with in the R3 beta. Second only to Uncharted 2′s beta, I’d say R3′s beta is one of the best I’ve ever played. Insomniac, you’ve hit a home run. Really balanced gameplay, nothing too overpowered (hated the Wraith in R2). I’ve been loving the R3 beta, and can’t wait for R3 to hit. Won’t get it immediately (need to save some money right now), but I will get it before the year is out, brand new somewhere to support you guys, because I’ve really loved the Resistance series, and can’t wait to see how it is all wrapped up.

And that multiplayer is just awesome in the beta. Looking forward to great single player and multiplayer!

BTW, why no trophies for R3 online? I’ve loved chasing the multiplayer trophies on R2 lately (except the Killing Machine one).

By: BOSTONJOHN32

BOSTONJOHN32 — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:32:38 +0000

when i play this game i look for a good sci fi story/campaign which is longer than the 6 o’clock news and a good multiplayer to fall back on.when i pre-order and then walk away with game in hand, this is what i want going into my ps3, not a prologue to multiplayer vibe, for a lack of a better term. lets not pass judgement on this game until it comes out, or pass on it period because the feelings one has toward another game makes one so angry that they see it everywhere they look.when i buy a army/special forces shooter i hope to find realism to a certain degree, when i buy a sci fi shooter, i want guns from out of this world and monsters to match. the only comparison i will make is the 2 games that were mentioned are fantasy related.one promising to deliver just that, and the other being a game when you throw live grenades back and forth like hot potato, survive nukes w/in feet from launching them, wielding to heavy powered shotguns while running in circles,pure fantasy.please remember that these are video games we are playing..and btw what a treat deus ex was to play. anyways i hope gamers dont pass this ps3 exclusive up because of comparing it, this will be a mistake.

By: BOSTONJOHN32

BOSTONJOHN32 — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:00:25 +0000

so if one wants to make a check list 1) unique story , check.. 2) campaign longer than a boxing match, check.
3) chimera, check.. 4) sci fi, check.. 5) weapons which are not used by any army of this world, check.. 6) campaign is core, w/ good multiplayer to fall back on instead of vice versa, check..

other than a few ribbons sim to k3,and a killstreak bonus i see nothing phased into this game but then again im not looking for them, what i am looking for is something different, a game w/ a story to tell, one which is unique and their own. and what a blast it was 2 play deus ex h.a.
i do not see nuke strikes or ninja perks anywhere, and keep in mind that this is a sci fi f.p.s.game and if one compares it to a war shooter i can see how it can be sim 2 a few, tossing live hand grenades back and forth like hot potato,nuke strikes survived while being in the radius of the launch, running around in circles wielding 2 shotguns, well yes it can be compared then, both being pure fantasy. but this is designed to be just that. if you ask me. lets let it launch before we pass judgement, or pass period.

By: BOSTONJOHN32

BOSTONJOHN32 — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:40:36 +0000

b3 will bring forth a game which will in fact be the best all around f.p.s. and for fans of c.o.d. this is actually a good thing, a great thing.. meaning mw4 will more than likely unleash hell in 2013 to claim back the seat they own as of today from a financial/popularity standpoint and make some changes that will show you the true potential of c.o.d. instead of what many feel as a recycled game. popularity will only take you so far, when a brick wall is place directly in front of you, then you must get around it to reach destination(b3 being the wall, destination is dominance. and in the meantime great games are often over looked, not played and suffers a profit margin they deserve because it either lacks the familiar style or has glimpses of a familiar style of a certain game. so if anyone is comparing this to anything else, its usually because the game they are comparing it to is their comfort zone game, or a game which they indeed hate for the dominance or style it has introduced and remains. this is the reason games do not sell as well as they should, and why developers tend to model a game w/ (insert) game in mind. this does not remind me of cod

By: BOSTONJOHN32

BOSTONJOHN32 — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:23:31 +0000

again this is all just my opinion, im just speaking from what i have seen in my many years of gaming. and games who put a choke hold in certain areas of gaming make companys feel pressured into having to follow or some how be or add an element which will remind you of a dominating factor in todays first persons shooters. choke hold has also been applied by e.a. w/madden . so this sint fanboy crap or activision vs e.a. . madden has dominated for so many years (since 05,i think) because they have obtained the rights to own the nfl w/in gaming basically, therefor either buy madden or dont play football on ps3. and because of this they have invested little to make any major changes in their games, but if there was another to compete w/ then we would see the true potential behind what madden could truely be, and thats a pure bred football simulation. this has happened to a lesser degree w/ f.p.s. and many sci-fi and even rpg’s will be compared if in fact at some point in the game you are holding a gun in first person, im not a fanboy, too old for that.. fact is that come mid oct. things will change, because the bar will be set higher on f.p.s. shooters..

By: BOSTONJOHN32

BOSTONJOHN32 — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:07:56 +0000

the problem is that every f.p.s. multi will be compared to call of duty. because of the fact the call of duty has a well oiled machine which pumps game after game out and also dollar after dollar, hence everyone owns , plays or has played a c.o.d. title.. the difference is quite clear, creativity and edge. my opinion is that c.o.d. as of late owns neither(except edging the w each fiscal year). so if this game had to be compared i would put it closer to killzone 3 than c.o.d. and even then its not close to being the same game, just a few things which can make one say “hey kinda reminds me of this or that” its impossible to bring a game which reminds you of nothing else but what is in front of you, and in the cases when it does, the company is taking a great chance and if its a winner, it will still have to contend w/ games which have deeper pockets and more success, thankfully resistance 3 is coming out. and until battlefield 3 shows us what f.p.s is supposed to look like from a mil. shooter/ f.p.s/epic period, then we will always compare to a game which is the most popular, and popular isnt always the best. as we all know

By: Timontimoteo

Timontimoteo — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:29:22 +0000

I already pre-ordered,I CANT WHAIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: cosmis_chaos

cosmis_chaos — Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:21:50 +0000

I am tired of people complaining about the upgrading of weapons and people griping about if the other person has a higher level then you. I went into the beta with people already had he Atomizer and I worked my way up to that level from level 1. If you can’t overcome the advantages people have over you because you are a lower level then you are most likely a very crappy gamer. I have destroyed shields, taken out people who are berserk, found invisible campers, outwitted snipers etc

.Don’t fool yourselves into thinking it is the perks that stop you from winning. The perks don’t aim the gun for you or think for you. Just because some people can figure out how to use them to their advantage better then you doesn’t mean a thing. I’ll bet that even without the perks you would still get your butt kicked and come up with another excuse why your losing. If you can’t adapt to situation and overcome your disadvantages then you should stop gaming immediately. Don’t blame R3, it’s your own crappy skills