So far, Payday IMO is the surprise hit for a $20 title. Totally worth it if you enjoy FPS! There’s great value w/ the maps included & the gameplay is well done. The only issues that needs addressing are the odd learning curve for player upgrades/leveling & a more efficient match-making/MP joining browser is sorely needed.

Dungeon Defenders is killing me; fun title but difficult. I do not regret buying it.

Infamous was the value of the year @ $10. If I had + then, my mind would be blown.

As much as I like PS/PS2 classics, they cost too much & a sale now & then would be great! (=

As soon as Crysis drops, it’s in my cart. For a $20 title, it’s another superb value. Yet I played it to death on my PC. Drop the price & I’ll don that awesome suit ready to invade N. Korea.

I’m looking forward to 2012 w/ Vita, Twisted Metal, ME 2, & various Vita titles… I know I’ll be blindsided by some hit PSN titles too. 2011- probably the best year to be a gamer!!

@22 liquidypoo, the cost of SotN really put me off. Way too expensive for me.

@ Phillyblunz, I understand your grief. But be sensible, 5 activations is rather absurd. It’s game-sharing (or Acct. sharing) which many users (particularly dorm buddies) exploit. You have 3x PS3s, I have 4x & will purchase another on black Friday. Designate a game & film room- it’s as simple as that.

@61 CaptainJames99, how does limiting activations violate anything when Sony can “revise” their terms? After all, console activations didn’t disappear- it’s down to 2x. Conversely, would these terms be violated if they raised the # of activations? How does this affect devs & their publishers except to limit “game-sharing?” … and “Many others are doing likewise.” Who are these many others? Stop talking nonsense.

If amazon starts charging more for shipping after Jan. 1st of 2012, it’s not a breach of contract to consumers who buy things at the former price in 2011. They got that former benefit of price and any orders placed before that, but not yet shipped, will be honored at the original shipping price.

You still have your 5 for all the content you already bought. You paid for 5, you got 5 and still do and ALWAYS WILL for the CONTENT YOU BOUGHT BEFORE the date the change takes place for FUTURE CONTENT.

Get over yourselves. Plus you’ll easily be able to deactivate and activate consoles now. I can’t help but feel 90% of the people complaining aren’t legit users of the 5 limit, but cheap people who are the reason this change is taking place. (ie; gamesharers) Otherwise, I’d think you’d be more reasonable with your complaints and not throw around some b/s like “ZOMG DA BREEEECHZ JU EVEEELZ SUNY”

Plus, aside from Soma being overpowered like crazy and some overpriced DLC it’s a great multiplayer game. Very addicting. If you don’t like it, fine, but it not being like another game in the series (which some fans seem to think is nothing like Castlevania anyway) is silly.

I resisted the console of popularity for the console of quality, or at least it used to be more so.

When PS3 exclusives were consistantly top of class in any genre they appeared in, sadly this is becoming much less common and outright rare to find a high quality PS3 exclusive.

Sure we still have Infamous and Drakes, but R3 was a let down, KZ3 was a let down, DCU was a let down, etc.

This year has been full of Sony fail, we were even invaded due to Sony’s perpetual attitude of take until nothing is left, like barbarians.

We were made to sign over ownership of our consoles very recently if we wanted to continue using the content we purchased over the last several years. What kind of choice is that!?!?!?!?! Give up thousands of dollars worth of content, or the ownership rights to the only device they have value on. I would LOL, if it wasnt so sickening.

We been duped, the only thing to do now is inform others that Sony cant be trusted to make purchases with.
And stop giving them any more money via PSN, or only blame yourselves when the inevitable occurs.