“I think the evidence is clear on this blog is clear for this conclusion.”

should be

“I think the evidence is clear on this blog for this conclusion.”

The comment to which you’re referring to contains your answer, but I will point it out to you:

“While I agree with you that Unfinished Swan and the likes are much better in subjective quality to some retail games, Unfinished Swan is not the game we got anyway. We’re getting the likes of Foosball (no story), Rochard (crap story, okay gameplay), and now Closure (which may be the best of the crap releases yet). I’ve only done the demo to Closure a while ago, and while the gameplay is interesting, there is absolutely no story as far as I can tell. If there was one, it is probably very short. So even using your subjective method of judging quality, we’re getting screwed.”

See that last line? I was demonstrating to the person who was conversing with me that even using a method OTHER than price, reception, and release date; that judging by -his- standards of evaluating quality (subjective, but something I agreed with on a personal level) we were still getting the shaft.

If you don’t understand what I mean by subjective and objective quality, I invite you to read further past to older comments by me where I make the distinction.

Wow, bud, you went through a lot of old comments to find all the possible holes in my arguments! Well done, and I apologize for the delay in my reply, I had a very long weekend.

PSPlus misled new Subscribers by placing Infamous 2 and LBP2 in the IGC and stating that they will continue to give free games every week. While they did not explicitly state that they will be of the same quality as those two games, they also did not explicitly state that they will have a focus on PSN games. This voluntary omission of information causes most, if not all, subscribers to look at Infamous 2 and LBP2 as examples of the kinds of content they will be receiving. Misleading. And according to comment 556 by chunterosa, I’m not the only one who feels this way.

As for the cancellation issue, I never stated it was a requirement. I merely remarked that coupled with the misleading IGC, a lack of a cancellation would result in “a recipe for mass complaints every week”. I think the evidence is clear on this blog is clear for this conclusion.

I long for the day that I can be proud of NA+ again. Come on SONY make some magic happen SOON!
LONG FOR THE MAGIC AGAIN!!
. .
__